Norm vs Behaviour

1. Normative Ethics

Normative ethics is concerned with establishing how things ought to be. It tries to answer questions about what is right and wrong, good and bad, and how people should act. There are three main theories under normative ethics:

• Consequentialism (e.g., Utilitarianism): The rightness or wrongness of actions depends on their consequences.
• Deontology: Actions are right or wrong based on rules or duties, regardless of their outcomes.
• Virtue Ethics: Focuses on the character of the individual and living a virtuous life rather than on rules or consequences.

2. Behavioral Ethics

Behavioral ethics examines how people actually behave when confronted with ethical dilemmas, often revealing gaps between ethical ideals and real-life behavior. It is more empirical and descriptive, based on how psychological, social, and environmental factors influence ethical behavior. This includes phenomena like:

• Moral disengagement: Rationalizing unethical behavior.
• Bounded ethicality: People unconsciously behave unethically.
• Ethical fading: When the ethical aspects of a decision disappear in the decision-making process.

3. Why-What-How Framework

This could refer to a structured approach to ethical decision-making or problem-solving:

• Why: Why is this issue important? This often addresses the motivations or ethical principles behind a decision.
• What: What are the possible options or courses of action? This stage identifies the decisions available and their consequences.
• How: How should we implement the decision? This concerns practical steps, taking into account constraints, responsibilities, and consequences.

In government or public policy contexts, normative ethics, behavioral ethics, and the why-what-how framework play important roles in shaping decisions that affect citizens. Here’s how they relate to governance:

1. Normative Ethics in Government

In government, normative ethics helps define the moral principles that should guide public policies and official conduct. Governments often create policies based on:

• Justice and fairness (distributive justice, equal treatment under the law)
• Human rights (freedom of speech, right to privacy)
• Utility or the common good (policies aimed at maximizing public well-being, like healthcare, education, or safety)
• Legal and institutional integrity (honoring the rule of law, transparency, accountability)

In this context, debates often arise between deontological approaches (e.g., governments following rules or legal frameworks strictly, even if the outcomes are not ideal) and consequentialist approaches (e.g., prioritizing policies that achieve the best outcomes for society, even if they require bending certain rules).

2. Behavioral Ethics in Government

Behavioral ethics is especially relevant to understanding how politicians, civil servants, and institutions actually behave, which may differ from ethical ideals. Factors influencing this include:

• Corruption: Government officials might make decisions based on personal gain rather than public good.
• Bias and discrimination: Implicit or explicit biases can affect decision-making, leading to unequal treatment of citizens.
• Moral disengagement: Officials may justify unethical behavior (e.g., justifying surveillance programs that infringe on privacy by arguing it's necessary for national security).
• Transparency: Public institutions may avoid transparency or fail to disclose information, leading to a lack of accountability.

3. The Why-What-How Framework in Government Decision-Making

The Why-What-How framework can be applied to structure the decision-making process in government policy:

• Why (Justification and Purpose):
  • Why is the government considering this policy? What problem is being addressed? For instance, "Why should we implement climate change legislation?" could be answered by explaining the need for sustainability, public health, and intergenerational equity.
• What (Policy Options and Ethical Considerations):
  • What options are available for addressing the issue? This could involve considering alternative policies, their social, economic, and environmental impacts, and the ethical implications of each option. For instance, a government could consider carbon taxes, renewable energy incentives, or international treaties to combat climate change.
• How (Implementation and Practicalities):
  • How should the government implement the chosen policy? This involves figuring out how to balance political, economic, and social constraints. For example, how to gain public support, enforce laws effectively, and ensure that policies are equitable and transparent.

Practical Example in Government Ethics:

Why:

A government might decide it needs to tackle income inequality due to its negative impact on social cohesion and economic mobility.

What:

It could consider different solutions: increasing taxes on the wealthy, implementing a minimum wage, or providing free public education. Ethical considerations might involve fairness (should wealth be redistributed?) and consequences (will higher taxes on the rich harm economic growth?).

How:

Finally, the government would need to decide how to implement the policy, ensuring that it is enforceable, equitable, and achieves the desired outcomes without unintended harm.

These principles help governments balance moral obligations with practical governance, ensuring that policy decisions serve the public good while adhering to ethical standards.