Skill Gap Analyser

Curated by Vinod Kumar Jain & Amit Jain · All Frontier Global · free, no login

List what a target role needs, mark how important each one is, and rate yourself honestly. The tool multiplies importance by shortfall and puts the gaps in the order worth closing them. Everything is self-reported — no role definition, no skills taxonomy and no assessment. The priority ordering is the only thing this adds, and it is arithmetic.

The arithmetic

• Shortfall = 5 − your current level, so an expert rating scores zero gap regardless of importance.
• Priority = importance weight × shortfall. Essential counts 3, important 2, nice-to-have 1.
• Gaps are listed highest priority first. Anything you rated 5 drops out entirely.
• Total gap is the sum of priorities, offered only as a rough sense of distance — it has no units and no meaning across different skill lists.

What to do with the order

• The top two are the ones to work on. Spreading effort across eight is how people spend a year and move nothing.
• Once you know what to close, the course ROI estimator and the certification cost-benefit tool weigh what closing it would cost in money and hours.
• Self-ratings are unreliable in both directions. People overrate familiar skills and underrate ones they use without noticing. If you can, have someone who has seen your work rate you too and compare.

Honest limits

• No skills taxonomy and no role definitions are embedded. What a job title requires differs by employer, seniority and country; the skill list is yours to write.
• Importance is a judgement, and usually the employer’s rather than yours. Read several postings for the target role before deciding what is essential.
• Not everything that matters is a skill. Track record, network, timing and how well you interview all sit outside this arithmetic and often outweigh it.

Sources

None. No skills framework, competency model, role taxonomy or labour-market dataset is embedded, fetched or implied — every entry is yours.

← all tools Business library